Categories
Updates from the Shelby County Commission

Right on the Bluff: March 2025

In this issue

  • Defending Dr. Feagins
  • Prioritizing public safety
  • Who’s Wanda Howard?
Categories
Updates from the Shelby County Commission

Milton grants by Wright

As stated in social media posts, I have been reviewing the Shelby County Commission’s community enhancement grant program (Milton grants).

In addition to sharing my perspective on and approach to the grant program, I have committed to take the following actions:

  1. Provide an account of my participation in the program.
  2. Support reforms to the program.
  3. Advocate for better technology and data sharing processes.
  4. Maintain an open door policy with citizens and media.

This blog post was drafted to meet the first of these commitments.

Categories
Updates from the Shelby County Commission

Right on the Bluff: February 2025

In this issue

  • The MSCS mess
  • Infrastructure repairs begin
  • The xAI factor
Categories
Updates from the Shelby County Commission

Right on the Bluff: January 2025

In this issue

  • New Year announcement
  • Judge Anderson resigns
  • Feagins in jeopardy
  • Sugarmon sues Sheriff
Categories
Updates from the Shelby County Commission

Right on the Bluff: December 2024

In this issue

  • Halbert case dismissed
  • Bartlett town hall
  • Happy Halo-days

Halbert case dismissed

November was an eventful month, with the Presidential election, Thanksgiving, and a new round of frustration with our local justice system.

As you know, I’ve been paying careful attention to the ouster case against the Shelby County Clerk. Once again, the case has been dismissed for lack of standing. This was the opinion of a circuit court judge who ruled that the county attorney’s office could not hire outside counsel as a way to work around her conflict of interest.

I released a statement on this second dismissal, and I also joined Memphis Morning News to discuss the latest developments in the case.

The court has wasted an entire year focusing on technicalities, without a moment’s consideration of the real problems harming real people in Shelby County. The merits of this case need to be heard. Then, and only then, will this matter be resolved.